teokitahara-bigotY7KSCUnit1

Making A Game On Powerpoint  By :Teo Kitahara-Bigot   INVESTIGATION Identify the Problem How can we make a game on powerpoint? Expalin the Problem

I have used powerpoint before but I have never made a computer game. I dont know how to make a game. I dont have an idea of what i am going to do.

Research and Analysis

I have done some research and i have found out how to make a power point game
this is the game that i found. This game is a very simple game but it is very well done. []

=
This game that i tried out was amazing! It is taking powerpoint to the next level!The graphics are very good! I also tried another game which was like a clasic mario game. At one point i was asking my self if this is actually a power point game. That is how good it was!====== [|www.gamespowerpoint.com] Design Brief My game is going to be like the first example that a showed called beach rally. But it is going to be different is is going to be based on Formula 1 racing cars. The cars are going to be different color and they are going to be cartoons. There will be a finish line and racing lines. At the top of the slide there will be a crowd. Product Specification My product must: Test Plan I am going to do my test by making a small replica of my game this is it: DESIGN  Pictures of my designs
 * My products links must all work
 * There must be sound efects
 * There must be a instruction page
 * There must be a you win page
 * There must be a Home page

Analysis of my designs My first design (Formula 1 Racing) can really hit all the design specifications and my design brief! It can have cool sound effects it can have a home page a instruction page and also you can win and it can have movments on the images!

My second design ( Who wants to be a millionaire) I like the design of the game. It fits in under all my design specifications and my design brief but it wont show my full potencial in making a game in powerpoint.

My last design is a make your own car game This game can't really have special sound effects but it can have music! I can also can't really fit under my design brief. So because this game doesn't really meet all of my specification i wouldn't want to do it on my 1st choice. Justification for chosen design I chose the Formula 1 design because it meets my design specification the most. I also chose it because i think i can do a good job on this one. It is also no good to make something that doesn't inspire you! I think that i can show all the skills that i know by making this game. PLAN i deleted version 1 so that i could reduce the size of the page. CREATE  Final Product i deleted version 1,2,3 so i could reduce the size of the page. Changes made to the original Design The red sentences is what i wrote about the changes to the original design and why!Another change that i made was the way i made one car hyperlink to the'YOU WIN SLIDE' I changed this because first of all i put motions on my game insted of having alot of slides that also effected the way i end my game! So the solution that i made was puting a invisible shape at the end so when ever you click on it it hyper links to another slide! THE YOU WIN SLIDE! Changes made to the original Plan  the explaination is here:   EVALUATE   Results of tests  i deleted version 1 so i could save space.

Recommendations for improvement I could improve my game in the future by making questions apear on the slide!instead of having a caller ask the questions! Another thing that i would change would be to make the words which are hyperlinked not to be underlined! that is one other skill that i need to figure out! Over all i think that there isn't many things that i could change on my game! I think that my game is probably the best thing i have done on a power point!

Self-evaluation of your execution of the design cycle  I think that in some parts i did not follow the design cycle completely! one of the things that i didnt do  very well in was following the order of the design cycle! the thing which i did which wasnt good was that  i started making my game before i finished doing the other parts of the design cycle! One other thing  that i didnt execute well was that the questions that were part of one of the parts of the design cycle   i didnt quite follow what the question asked and i lost a lot of marks on doing that foolish error! Over  all i dont think that i followed the design cycle in the order that it was suppose to be followed but the   design cycle was also very new to me and next time i will a better job with executing the design cycle. I also learned that if you dont follow the design cucle the way it is suppose to be followed then it can  also make the other parts dificult!

Investigation: I would definatly change the way i did the investigation stage because: I did not test  my plan properly and not the way it was suppose to be tested! I also did not have very good product  specifications!

design: In the design stage i got a 4 which is better! I got a 4 because i did not have my designs on a  piece of paper and only one of the designs were well thought of!

Planning stage: in the plannin stage i got a 5 which is very good for me! I got a five because i did every thing  but i did not have alot of explaination of the usage of time!